Xylella: a feared and curious disease

Last year it was listed as Australia’s Number 1 National Priority Plant Pest, but how many of you have ever heard about Xylella fastidiosa? And could it threaten our native plants?
[print-me target=".print-body, .print-title" do_not_print=".noprint"/]
Leaf of scarlet oak with some banding of colours between scorched and symptomless tissue but barely any yellow band. Photo: John Hartman, University of Kentucky, Bugwood.org | CC BY 3.0
A leaf of scarlet oak affected by Xylella fastidiosa with some banding of colours between scorched and symptomless tissue. Photo: John Hartman, University of Kentucky, Bugwood.org | CC BY 3.0

Diseases are often the most difficult of invasive species problems, and as Tim Low discovered at a recent symposium he attended on behalf of the Invasive Species Council, the reasons why are obvious.

Xylella fastidiosa is a bacteria from Latin America that has the Australian Government very worried because of the crops it is killing overseas, especially olives in Europe and grape vines in California. In Latin America it is harmful to coffee and citrus. Leaves wither and whole plants often die. Australia’s Plant Health Committee endorsed it in 2016 as Australia’s number 1 National Priority Plant Pest.

Xylella is thought to be capable of infecting almost 90 per cent of all plant species, but without causing any symptoms or doing any harm to most. In the plants it does harm it can show a long period of latency. This means it could enter Australia in almost any imported plant. It may have arrived within the past decade and not yet been detected.

It has different genotypes that behave very differently, by harming or not harming different plant species. It is so genetically variable that thinking of it as one species is misleading.

It became a major concern for Australian agriculture when it began killing grape vines in California back in the 1980s. It was allowed to recede into the background as an issue until a few years ago when ancient olive groves began dying over large areas of Italy. It is harmful in tropical and subtropical regions but not where climates are cold.

Information is very sparse about the threat this disease poses to Australia’s native plants. There are graphic images online showing golden wreath wattles (Acacia saligna) in Europe dying from the disease, along with a very damaged hop-bush (Dodonaea viscosa) and seriously affected native rosemary (Westringia fruticosa). It has no impact on eucalypts in Europe and little impact on silver wattles (Acacia dealbata), but those conclusions apply only to the strain or strains currently in Europe.

It is spread between plants by sap-sucking bugs (only xylem feeders), and these can achieve high numbers in irrigated monocultures, which means that the catastrophic death rates seen on farms won’t necessarily occur in the wild.

I can find no evidence from published research that Xylella has caused large-scale deaths in natural vegetation. A keynote speaker at the symposium, Marie-Agnes Jacques, told me the disease had not been found in native vegetation close to infected crops in southern France. An American researcher told me that in American forests no one is looking because there is no funding. I found articles indicating that Xylella is causing leaf scorch in America’s native oaks, elms, maples and sycamores, but no mention of trees dying.

An obvious challenge is diagnosing the presence of this disease in plants passing through quarantine. Not only can infected plants show no symptoms, but plants infected with other diseases can show the same symptoms as Xylella. It justifies a very precautionary approach towards plant imports, especially those from South America, where the bacteria is genetically most diverse. Its arrival in Europe has been blamed on coffee plants imported from that continent.

I came away from this symposium with more questions than answers, and I suspect that for most delegates it was the same. Large numbers of research papers have been published without answering many important questions.

In Australia we can be assured that because this disease is so serious for agriculture (and horticulture as well) strenuous efforts will be made to keep it out.

  • Tim Low attended the International Symposium on Xylella fastidiosa in Brisbane earlier this year on behalf of the Invasive Species Council.

Email Preview

Dear [your member of parliament],

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …



Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]


Your gift is a lifeline for nature.

Our protected areas are being trashed, trampled, choked and polluted by an onslaught of invaders. Invasive species are already the overwhelming driver of our animal extinction rate, and are expected to cause 75 of the next 100 extinctions.

But you can help to turn this around and create a wildlife revival in Australia.

From numbats to night parrots, a tax-deductible donation today can help defend our wildlife against the threat of invasive weeds, predators, and diseases.

As the only national advocacy environment group dedicated to stopping this mega threat, your gift will make a big difference.

Do you need help?

Accordion Content

A silent crisis is unfolding across Australia. Every year, billions of native animals are hunted and killed by cats and foxes. Fire ants continue to spread and threaten human health. And the deadly strain of bird flu looms on the horizon. Your donation today will be used to put the invasive species threat in the media, make invasive species a government priority, ensure governments take rapid action to protect nature and our remarkable native wildlife from invasives-led extinction, death and destruction.

Donate Now

If you are having technical trouble making a donation, please read this guide.

Please fill out the following form and one of our team will be in contact to assist as soon as possible. Please make sure to include any helpful information, such as the device you were using (computer, tablet or mobile phone) and if known, your browser (Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari etc).

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, docx, doc, pdf, txt, Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 4.

    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]


    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]