The dark side of cats in Australia

Cats can be affectionate, playful, mischievous, lazy and regal, but they also have a dark side, one that has taken a huge toll on Australian wildlife.
[print-me target=".print-body, .print-title" do_not_print=".noprint"/]

Enigmatic, affectionate, playful, mischievous, lazy, regal, snuggly. These are just some of the fond descriptions that may spring to mind when we think about our lovable pet cats.

Yet free roaming cats, both pet and feral cats, have impacts on our environment that are dark and disturbing. Most of these impacts are often hidden from view or are invisible to the naked eye. Few of us witness the moment a cat stalks and kills its prey and the transmission of cat-dependent diseases is impossible to see with the naked eye.

In recent years, there has been a significant amount of research on cats, including by the Threatened Species Recovery Hub.

First, let’s have a closer look at the impact of cats on Australian native wildlife.

A quick snapshot: cat impacts in Australia

Cats were introduced to Australia by First Fleet settlers who brought them here in 1788 as companion animals, as reminders of home, and for their perceived role in controlling pest rodent populations.

Now, 232 years after they were introduced, cats:

  • have spread across the entire Australian mainland and its larger islands;
  • have played a significant role in the extinction of 34 mammals;
  • are a major factor causing the imperilment of at least 123 nationally threatened species.
A cat makes off with its prey, a rosella. Photo: Brisbane City Council | CC2.0
A cat makes off with its prey, a rosella. Photo: Brisbane City Council | CC2.0

Fight, escape or freeze?

We’ve all heard of the “fight or flight” stress response. This concept was developed by influential physiologist Walter B Cannon who in 1911 noted in his journal:

“Got idea that adrenals in excitement serve to affect muscular power and mobilise sugar for muscular use-this in wild state readiness for fight or run!”

This “fight or run” concept gradually morphed into the “fight or flight” response so commonly used today to describe how animals respond to an aggressive encounter with a member of the same species, or exposure to a predator. The concept suggests that the key physiological responses for animals in response to a competitor or predator are to fight, or quickly escape.

However, evidence suggests not all animals show this stress response when they should.

Many Australian animals have proven particularly susceptible to introduced predators, probably due to:

  • their slow life histories, including low rates of reproduction;
  • some form of predator naivety;
  • the widespread distribution of cats all over Australia-no habitat or mainland site offers refuge from cats;
  • the compounding impacts of many other threats (notably, habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation).

The result has been that our native wildlife populations are incapable of coping with the impacts of highly efficient predators that can increase in numbers faster than their Australian prey, such as cats and foxes.

Overall, the impacts of cats on Australian wildlife are far more severe than for any other continent. A comprehensive and in-depth discussion of the impact of cats in Australia can be found in the book Cats in Australia, written by John Woinarski, Sarah Legge and Chris Dickman.

Just how many Australian animals do cats kill?

A key component of the Threatened Species Recovery Hub’s cat research has been focused on improving our understanding of the impact of cats on Australian wildlife.

To underpin this work, it was important to develop improved estimates of the number of feral and pet cats in Australia. That estimate allowed us to quantify the annual toll taken by cats on reptiles, birds, mammals, frogs and invertebrates in Australia.

To achieve this, information was collated from about 100 cat dietary studies, and where possible, modelling and extrapolating from these to derive a spatial layer of the variation in numbers (and types) of animals killed per cat, and multiplying this by the number of cats in Australia.

The research findings from these studies has been synthesised into a fact sheet on the impact of cats in Australia.

Authors: Tida Nou, John Woinarski, Sarah Legge and Jaana Dielenberg-Threatened Species Recovery Hub

Email Preview

Dear [your member of parliament],

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …



Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]


Your gift is a lifeline for nature.

Our protected areas are being trashed, trampled, choked and polluted by an onslaught of invaders. Invasive species are already the overwhelming driver of our animal extinction rate, and are expected to cause 75 of the next 100 extinctions.

But you can help to turn this around and create a wildlife revival in Australia.

From numbats to night parrots, a tax-deductible donation today can help defend our wildlife against the threat of invasive weeds, predators, and diseases.

As the only national advocacy environment group dedicated to stopping this mega threat, your gift will make a big difference.

Do you need help?

Accordion Content

A silent crisis is unfolding across Australia. Every year, billions of native animals are hunted and killed by cats and foxes. Fire ants continue to spread and threaten human health. And the deadly strain of bird flu looms on the horizon. Your donation today will be used to put the invasive species threat in the media, make invasive species a government priority, ensure governments take rapid action to protect nature and our remarkable native wildlife from invasives-led extinction, death and destruction.

Donate Now

If you are having technical trouble making a donation, please read this guide.

Please fill out the following form and one of our team will be in contact to assist as soon as possible. Please make sure to include any helpful information, such as the device you were using (computer, tablet or mobile phone) and if known, your browser (Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari etc).

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, docx, doc, pdf, txt, Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 4.

    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]


    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]