On the inside: news about biosecurity

The agricultural and environmental biosecurity office has had budgets slashed, biosecurity funding is on the table, the National Biosecurity Strategy is moving forward, and the Decade of Biosecurity has a new national coordinator.
[print-me target=".print-body, .print-title" do_not_print=".noprint"/]

The agricultural and environmental biosecurity office has had budgets slashed, biosecurity funding is on the table, the National Biosecurity Strategy is moving forward, and the Decade of Biosecurity has a new national coordinator.

CEBO downgrading and belt tightening

It’s only March but 2023 has started with worrying news of a restructure and severe belt tightening at the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

There are new controls on the recruitment of new staff, training and travel and biosecurity spending is being seriously scrutinised. We expect this to reduce the already disappointing attention given to environmental biosecurity risks. Some concerns stem from the costs of creating separate environmental and agriculture agencies after the federal election. Beforehand these functions were within a single organisation.

In a major setback for the environment, a department restructure released in February showed the Chief Environmental Biosecurity Officer had been downgraded. The position was previously at the first assistant secretary level, mirroring the other two chiefs – Chief Veterinary Officer and Chief Plant Protection Officer. The Chief Environmental Biosecurity Officer has now been reclassified as assistant secretary level, reporting to the plant protection officer. This leaves two chiefs and one sub-chief.

Being subsumed into plant health functions will impact on the environmental focus of biosecurity decision-making at the senior level and weaken the status of the Chief Environmental Biosecurity Officer. The Invasive Species Council has long been concerned that environmental risks have been poorly prioritised in a biosecurity system focused on diseases and pests impacting on agriculture and this restructure will be a significant setback since the role was created by the coalition government in 2018 as a result of our advocacy.

In a related change, Dr Robyn Cleland resigned as Chief Environmental Biosecurity Officer at the end of December when she retired from the public service after a distinguished career. The Invasive Species Council was impressed with Robyn’s two-year stint in the environmental biosecurity role where she enthusiastically championed the needs of the environment within biosecurity circles and consolidated the work of inaugural environmental biosecurity chief, Ian Thompson.   

The incoming Chief Environmental Biosecurity Officer is Dr Bertie Henneke. Bertie has a botany and agricultural academic background and has held senior roles in the federal government including heading up the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) and leading plant biosecurity policy. 

We look forward to supporting Bertie in this new role and will push for the role’s first assistant secretary status to be reinstated. 

Biosecurity strategy moving forward

There was much promise that things would be different when agriculture and biosecurity ministers adopted the National Biosecurity Strategy in August 2022. Top of the priority list were stronger partnerships, a shared biosecurity culture, boosted capacity to respond to outbreaks and sustainable investment.

Six months on and the stakeholder Implementation Committee has met twice, providing feedback to proposed quick wins and the process for developing an implementation committee (due by July 2023) and action plan. The implementation plan will define a new governance structure and implementation framework while the action plan will spell out specific efforts and a monitoring framework. 

The Invasive Species Council is a member of the implementation committee, along with state and federal government reps, biosecurity industry and RDC reps, Australian Council of Trade Unions, Australian Food and Grocery Council, National Farmers’ Federation, NRM Regions Australia, Northern Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance and Freight and Trade Alliance.  The next implementation committee meeting will be held on 9 March 2023.

There’s still no change on the ground for now, but we are hoping these reforms deliver the promised changes quickly. Expectations are high and the biosecurity risks are growing. We will know in the coming months whether our federal, state and territory biosecurity agencies can deliver the changes so desperately needed.

A new phase for Decade of Biosecurity 

With the 2020s well underway, so too are plans to make this decade – the Decade of Biosecurity – mean something big for biosecurity. The implementation plan that has been under development since October 2022 is close to finalisation after a February national online workshop attended by about 50 people. This has led to a narrower focus, and a call for lead partners. Key projects are a national communications program, a network of biosecurity champions, a general biosecurity surveillance network, a national biosecurity response network and a partnership agreement.

The implementation plan will be finalised in March and launched in the second quarter of 2023. We are also pleased to welcome on board Emily Mellor as our new Decade of Biosecurity coordinator.

The Decade of Biosecurity is a collaborative initiative involving NRM, landcare, farmer, industry, community, biosecurity preparedness bodies and research groups, together with state, territory and federal biosecurity agencies. Invasive Species Council CEO Andrew Cox chairs the steering committee. See biosecurity2030.org.au to sign the biosecurity2030 pledge and learn what’s happening. 

Funding for biosecurity

The need to source new funds for biosecurity has been a prominent topic since the 2017 biosecurity review found current funding could not keep up with growing risks and proposed a small levy on incoming shipping containers. After the container levy was abandoned in 2020 due to importer resistance and insufficient support from the agriculture sector, a replacement income source needed to be found. 

The federal Labor government is going to address this major deficiency after being elected on a promise to ‘deliver long-term, sustainable funding’ for strengthened biosecurity. A discussion paper presenting the full suite of options was released for comment in November 2022. There hasn’t been much action since, presumably with more detail to emerge in the 2023-24 federal budget in May. 

You can see the Invasive Species Council submission to the discussion paper here [add link when it is on our website or else delete this sentence].

Ensure you’re subscribed to Feral Herald for future insider updates on biosecurity.

Email Preview

Dear [your member of parliament],

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …



Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]


Your gift is a lifeline for nature.

Our protected areas are being trashed, trampled, choked and polluted by an onslaught of invaders. Invasive species are already the overwhelming driver of our animal extinction rate, and are expected to cause 75 of the next 100 extinctions.

But you can help to turn this around and create a wildlife revival in Australia.

From numbats to night parrots, a tax-deductible donation today can help defend our wildlife against the threat of invasive weeds, predators, and diseases.

As the only national advocacy environment group dedicated to stopping this mega threat, your gift will make a big difference.

Do you need help?

Accordion Content

A silent crisis is unfolding across Australia. Every year, billions of native animals are hunted and killed by cats and foxes. Fire ants continue to spread and threaten human health. And the deadly strain of bird flu looms on the horizon. Your donation today will be used to put the invasive species threat in the media, make invasive species a government priority, ensure governments take rapid action to protect nature and our remarkable native wildlife from invasives-led extinction, death and destruction.

Donate Now

If you are having technical trouble making a donation, please read this guide.

Please fill out the following form and one of our team will be in contact to assist as soon as possible. Please make sure to include any helpful information, such as the device you were using (computer, tablet or mobile phone) and if known, your browser (Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari etc).

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, docx, doc, pdf, txt, Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 4.

    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]


    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]