Number 1 Seabird Threat

[print-me target=".print-body, .print-title" do_not_print=".noprint"/]
One of the beneficiaries of eradication of invasive species on islands is Gould's petrel. Photo: Tony Morris (creative commons licence)
One of the beneficiaries of eradication of invasive species on islands is Gould’s petrel. Photo: Tony Morris (creative commons licence)

A new conservation issue emerged a couple of decades ago when Tasmanian wildlife officer Nigel Brothers showed that fishing operations were driving down albatross and petrel numbers by accidentally killing them as bycatch. The threat of long-line fishing caught public attention and led to reformed fishing practices, though seabird numbers continue to fall.[1]

An issue for seabirds globally with a much lower profile but even higher threat level is invasive species. A review of Birdlife International’s assessments of threatened birds published in Bird Conservation International in 2012 found that 75 percent of threatened seabird species are threatened or potentially threatened by invasive species compared to 41 percent threatened as bycatch and 40 per cent at risk from climate change plus severe weather.[2]

The invasive species causing problems on seabird breeding islands around the world include rodents, cats, pigs, goats, dogs, rabbits and cattle, all of which have been removed from some islands to improve seabird survival. By late 2006, rodents had been eradicated from 332 islands. Seabirds are especially vulnerable to predators on land because their extreme adaptations for life at sea render them clumsy on ground.

Subantarctic Macquarie Island was the Australian island with the best-known problems due to the combined impacts of cats, rabbits and rats. Endangered blue petrels were nesting only in small numbers on offshore stacks in the years before cats were eliminated. The problems were complicated by subantarctic skuas multiplying on a diet of rabbits and then becoming major predators of prions and other small petrels at their burrow mouths. Since a massive eradication program of cats, rabbits and rodents, vegetation has been recovering and seabirds returning to nest in growing numbers. Stephen Garnett says that ‘a suite of breeding seabirds once thought to be highly threatened in Australian territory has increased so much they can probably come off threatened species lists’.[3]

Skuas are predatory birds that can benefit from invasive rabbits or rodents, and the resulting build up in their numbers can then increase predation pressures on threatened seabirds. Photo: Su Yin Khoo (creative commons licence)
Skuas are predatory birds that can benefit from invasive rabbits or rodents, and the resulting build up in their numbers can then increase predation pressures
on threatened seabirds. Photo: Su Yin Khoo (creative commons licence)

Another conservation success due to an island eradication program is Gould’s petrel on NSW’s Cabbage Tree Island.[3] In 1989 it was the sole Australian breeding site with just 250 breeding pairs. Chicks were being killed by pied currawongs because rabbits had eaten out the understorey. Chicks were also becoming entangled in the sticky fruits of pisonia trees (Pisonia umbellifera). Since eradication of all three, and establishment of an additional breeding population on another island, numbers have climbed to over 1000 breeding pairs.

Another success was Lord Howe Island’s endemic woodhen, which has recovered from a population of just 10 pairs in the 1970s to 220 today due to the eradication of pigs and cats.[3] The New South Wales government is committed to eradicating rats from Lord Howe Island, and ISC is represented on the technical committee advising on the NSW Environmental Trust. Other Australian seabird islands facing predator problems include Norfolk Island, Christmas Island and Phillip Island.

References

[1] Some of this blog was previously published in Feral Herald in July 2012.

[2] Croxall J, et al. (2012) Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conservation International 22: 1-34

[3] Garnett S. (2013) How birds are saved. Wildlife Australia 50(2): 30-32.

Email Preview

Dear [your member of parliament],

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …



Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]


Your gift is a lifeline for nature.

Our protected areas are being trashed, trampled, choked and polluted by an onslaught of invaders. Invasive species are already the overwhelming driver of our animal extinction rate, and are expected to cause 75 of the next 100 extinctions.

But you can help to turn this around and create a wildlife revival in Australia.

From numbats to night parrots, a tax-deductible donation today can help defend our wildlife against the threat of invasive weeds, predators, and diseases.

As the only national advocacy environment group dedicated to stopping this mega threat, your gift will make a big difference.

Do you need help?

Accordion Content

A silent crisis is unfolding across Australia. Every year, billions of native animals are hunted and killed by cats and foxes. Fire ants continue to spread and threaten human health. And the deadly strain of bird flu looms on the horizon. Your donation today will be used to put the invasive species threat in the media, make invasive species a government priority, ensure governments take rapid action to protect nature and our remarkable native wildlife from invasives-led extinction, death and destruction.

Donate Now

If you are having technical trouble making a donation, please read this guide.

Please fill out the following form and one of our team will be in contact to assist as soon as possible. Please make sure to include any helpful information, such as the device you were using (computer, tablet or mobile phone) and if known, your browser (Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari etc).

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, docx, doc, pdf, txt, Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 4.

    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]


    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]