Growing debate about feral horses

As feral horse numbers grow in the Australian Alps in the absence of an effective control program, so too is concern about the escalating damage.
[print-me target=".print-body, .print-title" do_not_print=".noprint"/]
The lack of effective control programs is allowing feral horse numbers to grow in the Australian Alps. Image courtesy Don Butcher
The lack of effective control programs is allowing feral horse numbers to grow in the Australian Alps. Image courtesy Don Butcher

As feral horse numbers grow in the Australian Alps in the absence of an effective control program, so too is concern about the escalating damage.

The NSW national parks service is updating its failed 2008 feral horse management plan. It aims to have a draft ‘Wild Horse Management Plan’ by April 2015 and is conducting a series of interactive web-based ‘conversations’ from July until the end of November [extended until 12 Dec 2014]. Get involved by visiting the Protect the Snowies website. One of the discussions until 27 October is ‘What does humane treatment mean to you?’.

The Victorian Government has delayed the release of its draft horse plan, presumably because of the November state election, but we welcome the Environment Minister’s acceptance that all options are now on the table, including aerial shooting.

A Guardian story: A time to cull? The battle over Australia’s brumbies gives an excellent and stark account of the environmental and welfare impacts of ‘swelling numbers’ of feral horses. The one thing we take issue with is the statement that ‘even now, conservationists are not game to talk publicly about aerial culling’. We and other groups have been publicly calling for it for some years now.

ANU ecologists Don Driscoll and Sam Banks in The grim story of the Snowy Mountains’ cannibal horses (The Conversation) compare the fate of feral horses and the environment under the current approach and with aerial shooting. They find that, ‘over ten years, more horses suffer and die, and the environmental impacts are substantially worse without aerial culling than with it’.

The Invasive Species Council received this thoughtful piece from one of our southern NSW supporters, Graham Scully.

At almost the same time as NPWS began a review of the management of wild (read feral) horses in Kosciuszko National Park, the National Museum of Australia mounted a major exhibition ‘Spirited: Australia’s horse story‘.

Diane Thompson, noticing that the exhibition didn’t refer at all to the problems of feral horses in Australia’s alpine regions, negotiated with the museum to contribute to a blog, in which the spectrum of thoughts and feelings about horses in our natural environments is being shared. Diane’s piece Horses in the high country: Is there a ‘dark side’ to the presence of horses in Australia? has generated many comments.

Another site that is highly interesting to me is Horses for Discourses, a critical examination of the horse in Australian culture. As a psychologist, I have been fascinated by the strength of opposing views on all kinds of issues and the apparent inability of different camps to listen to or be influenced by opposing arguments. It’ss well worth putting in the time to begin to understand the background and long-held attitudes to horses in Australia’s culture.

Scroll through Phar Lap’s heart and war horses to:

    • Scenes from Snowy river: early bushmen’s cruelty to horses, the horse as a cultural symbol and its connection to who we are as a nation
    • the similar issues over ferals / mustangs in the USA
    • the true history of the stockman and why we, as Australians, want so much to believe in the noble stockman
    • another dark side, the stockman and his horse in colonisation and dispossession of the Aboriginal people
    • the Bulletin debates, 1809-1910 between writers and poets, Lawson and Patterson on the virtues of the city VS the bush and the question of why as we become more urban do we want to cling more to the bushman-hero myth.
    • Some must read poetry. Here is just one verse from Francis Kenna’s ‘Banjo, of the Overflow’.

I am tired of reading prattle of the sweetly-lowing cattle   

Stringing out across the open with the bushmen riding free;

I am sick at heart of roving up and down the country droving,  

And of alternating damper with the salt-junk and the tea.

Read also

80,000 feral horses for the Australian Alps? >>

 

Email Preview

Dear [your member of parliament],

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …

Email copy here …



Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]


Your gift is a lifeline for nature.

Our protected areas are being trashed, trampled, choked and polluted by an onslaught of invaders. Invasive species are already the overwhelming driver of our animal extinction rate, and are expected to cause 75 of the next 100 extinctions.

But you can help to turn this around and create a wildlife revival in Australia.

From numbats to night parrots, a tax-deductible donation today can help defend our wildlife against the threat of invasive weeds, predators, and diseases.

As the only national advocacy environment group dedicated to stopping this mega threat, your gift will make a big difference.

Do you need help?

Accordion Content

A silent crisis is unfolding across Australia. Every year, billions of native animals are hunted and killed by cats and foxes. Fire ants continue to spread and threaten human health. And the deadly strain of bird flu looms on the horizon. Your donation today will be used to put the invasive species threat in the media, make invasive species a government priority, ensure governments take rapid action to protect nature and our remarkable native wildlife from invasives-led extinction, death and destruction.

Donate Now

If you are having technical trouble making a donation, please read this guide.

Please fill out the following form and one of our team will be in contact to assist as soon as possible. Please make sure to include any helpful information, such as the device you were using (computer, tablet or mobile phone) and if known, your browser (Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari etc).

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, docx, doc, pdf, txt, Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 4.

    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]


    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]